A 2018 report by Katie Hopkins, titled “Sources: Corrupt Members of South African Police Force Facilitate Farm Attacks,” has resurfaced, reigniting discussions about the role of the South African Police Service (SAPS) in the ongoing issue of farm attacks in South Africa.

The report, originally published on Hopkins’ website, alleges systemic corruption within SAPS, claiming that some officers actively facilitate violent attacks on white farmers, a group disproportionately targeted in the country.

Alarming Statistics and a Dangerous Profession

According to the report, in the first 40 days of 2018, South Africa recorded 41 farm attacks and five murders on white-owned farms. While globalists might argue these numbers are statistically minor compared to the country’s overall violent crime rates, the report emphasizes that the approximately 32,000 commercial farmers face a murder rate comparable to that of South Africa’s 152,000 police officers, approximately 145 deaths per 100,000. This statistic, provided by Dr. Johan Burger, a Senior Research Consultant at the Institute of Security Studies (ISS), underscores that being a white farmer in South Africa is one of the most dangerous occupations globally.

Dr. Burger, whose daughter serves as a police officer, noted wryly that she is safer combating criminals than farming. His research suggests that the South African government has failed to meet its constitutional obligation to combat crime effectively, particularly in protecting farmers.

Allegations of Police Complicity

The report’s most disturbing claim is that elements within SAPS are complicit in farm attacks. Hopkins cites an anonymous police sergeant who, risking his career, met her in Pretoria’s Botanical Gardens to share his concerns. The sergeant alleged that police weapons, including rifles signed out from stations, and police ammunition have been used in farm attacks. He further claimed that evidence, such as police dockets, is routinely destroyed or “lost” to protect perpetrators, often due to bribery or political affiliations.

Dr. Burger corroborated these claims, referencing a 2016 doctoral thesis on cash-in-transit robbers who admitted to buying police cooperation, including access to rifles, safe houses for stolen money, and the deliberate mishandling of investigations. Victims of farm attacks, such as a woman named Marietta, who was shot and told by police that no cars were available to respond, recounted similar experiences of futility when seeking help.

Political Affiliations and a Culture of Impunity

The report suggests that political affiliations exacerbate the issue. The sergeant estimated that 30–35% of SAPS members are affiliated with the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), a political party known for its radical stance on land redistribution. He described the African National Congress (ANC) and EFF as “two heads of the same beast,” with the ANC maintaining an international facade while the EFF pursues aggressive anti-white policies at the grassroots level. The report claims that officers aligned with the ANC, EFF, or Black Land First (BLF) often refuse to process arrests of politically connected perpetrators, referring to them as “brothers.”

Hopkins highlights a 2017 ANC policy allowing land expropriation without compensation, which she argues creates a permissive environment for farm attacks. Political rhetoric, such as the EFF’s protest song “Kill the Boer, kill the white man,” is said to embolden corrupt officers to ignore or even facilitate crimes against white farmers.

Systemic Corruption at the Top

The report also criticizes the leadership of SAPS, pointing to the 2012 appointment of Rhia Phiyega, a social worker, as National Police Commissioner. Phiyega allegedly appointed unqualified individuals, including a teacher as her deputy and a theologian as Head of Strategic Management, prioritizing political loyalty over competence. Dr. Burger described this as part of a broader pattern of cronyism, where politically connected officers secure high-ranking positions for family and friends, undermining the force’s effectiveness.

A Climate of Fear and Inaction

Hopkins’ interviews with victims and insiders paint a grim picture of a justice system designed to fail farmers. The sergeant expressed fear of retaliation for speaking out, stating that farm attacks should be classified as terrorism but are ignored by the government. Dr. Burger recounted instances of police officers abusing their authority, such as a captain who targeted white farmers for arrests to assert dominance, reflecting lingering resentment from the apartheid era.

The report concludes with a stark warning: white farmers are being “hunted to extinction” in South Africa, with little international attention compared to endangered species like the white rhino. Hopkins contrasts the trust in police in countries like England with the fear among South African farmers, who view SAPS as unreliable or even complicit.

Ongoing Relevance and Controversy

Seven years after its publication, Hopkins’ report remains a polarizing document. Critics argue it sensationalizes the issue and lacks firm evidence of a political directive orchestrating farm attacks. Supporters, however, point to the persistent high rates of farm violence and ongoing allegations of police corruption as evidence of its relevance. The debate continues to fuel discussions about land reform, racial tensions, and the role of law enforcement in South Africa’s complex socio-political landscape.

For further details on farm attacks and police reform, readers can explore resources from the Institute of Security Studies (ISS) or follow ongoing discussions on platforms like X.

Note: The original report is accessible via the Wayback Machine at hopkinsworld.com. Also read “South African police actively involved in White Farmer attacks” on WatchOut News.